Comments on: Angelina Jolie still hasn’t given birth

By: Jhoey27

Jhoey27 — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:35:25 +0000

Has anyone heard that a UK magazine called Closer has posted that Angie gave birth to the twins today. It’s not a magazine from here, actually if you go to their website, the news is written in French but it’s on Dlisted then you click on Closer. Don’t know how true it is, but we’ll soon find out, I just want to know the sexes.

By: Laura

Laura — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:32:59 +0000

Yes, she and Brad are very open about their views of the paps. They openly state that they don’t mind them following them. They just don’t want them hounding the kids. So, Angelina should stay inside her house. Let’s just give you that for the sake of reason. Then, what about her kids? Should they stay inside and never come out out of fear of helicopters? How is that right when these kids did nothing to deserve that? They have no control over who their parents are. The media is definitely a game. And Angie, Brad, and pretty much all of Hollywood play along. But I find it hard to believe that Maddox, Pax, Zahara, and Shiloh even know or play along with the Hollywood Media Game.

By: kim

kim — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:39:49 +0000

Laura
Jun 26, 2008 at 9:53 pm

I didn’t say anything about all the sarcastic comments you made towards me. All I said, was that she could have seen the helicopter and decided all on her own it was a good chance to show the world she was still preggo. Don’t get your knickers tied in a knot, people have different opinions, and if you go back a read the many interviews AJ has given she is very open and upfront, and she knows how the game is played and what is expected of her. Even if she thinks it is ridiculous.

By: Lara

Lara — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:44:11 +0000

I never believed ET’s story anyway and I was very angry when I read something like “maybe angelina should show herself in public in order to put the rumours to rest”. Why SHOULD she do that? Does she has a duty to us, the public, to keep us informed of everything in her life? Is she the queen of england or the president of a state and has duties to her people? And even if it were, in my opinion, no matter the social status of a person, private life is private life. After all, that’s why it’s called “private”! And if she doesn’t announce the birth, so what? It’s nobody’s bussiness but her own and her family’s. Just because she is a public person (and I’ve noticed that it is a custom among cellebrities to anounce these kind of events) doesn’t mean that she has to share her life with the public. If she wants to do it she will do it because she knows that, apart from all the haters, there are people out there who care deeply about her and want to know that she is well and the babies are well.
Regarding the paps, a few days ago I was talking to some friends about this and I told them that if I had the power to decide I would forbid this job and with the greatest pleasure. Not that I want to contribute to the unemployment rate :P but they simply are worms, animals (and for me lady dy is the most vivd example, but this is another subject). Strict laws and interdictions won’t work. After all, they can reorientate to any other type of journalism:))
I don’t know if the photos were arranged or not, glad to see angie is ok and if I were her I would stay in that chateau until the babies are one year old and then go out to shopping with them:))))) this would be the greatest humilliation for the paps and I think that they would quit their jobs from their own initiative.
Good night.

By: accidentalBRANfan

accidentalBRANfan — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:52:07 +0000

I am writing here to admit something. Despite my maturity and intelligence, I have found myself quite the fan of brangelina and their brood. I LOVE the stories & fotos about them.

On top of surprising myself by my keen interest in the growing family, I have a history of strong distaste for that “lack of privacy” issue. (I’ve always said I would HATE to be famous and loose my anonymity).

So here I am on the other side of the fence: wishing, waiting, hoping for more fotos — on their private property or not — of the jolie-pitts. I am really into seeing a still pregnant Angelina after all the mystery around the birth of the twins.

That makes me an accessory to the invasion of privacy. This is a conflict that now resides in me and I am interested in the larger implications.

By: BlessBrangelina

BlessBrangelina — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:38:44 +0000

ET is a joke. Jossip is so far up in their and Snead’s behinds, it’s not funny! Can’t wait for Associated Press to start too.

She looks healthily, pregnant and at home! Which she is!

Am rather disappointed that they managed to get a pic of her!

By: BlessBrangelina

BlessBrangelina — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:37:30 +0000

ET is a joke. Jossip is so far up in their and Snead’s a**es, it’s not funny! Can’t wait for AP to start too.

She looks healthily, pregnant and at home! Which she is!

Am rather disappointed that they managed to get a pic of her!

By: BlessBrangelina

BlessBrangelina — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:36:15 +0000

ET is a joke. Jossip is so far up in their and Snead’s ar*es, it’s not funny! Can’t wait for AP to start too.

She looks healthily preggars and at home! Which she is!

Am rather disappointed that they managed to get a pic of her!

By: lu

lu — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:59:37 +0000

her belly is big, and looks beautiful. We have to wait until birth.

By: Magnolia

Magnolia — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:15:07 +0000

Jeez, are they really from inside her private property? I was not aware of that. It seemed to me like they had taken it of them in front of there front door. They can sue, right?
I remember when the x went to court with Brad and won because of some topless pics that were taken in there private property. Anyways I hope they do because this is really to much, I can only imagine how violated she most feel.