<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brad Pitt in Inglourious Basterds &#8211; First photo!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/</link>
	<description>Crushable gives you the celebrity news, style and scoop on the stuff you care about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kati</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-140830</link>
		<dc:creator>Kati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-140830</guid>
		<description>I think that this new photo of Brad is absolutely wonderful. He looks really handsome. I normally don´t like QT´s movies because they´re very violent. But this movie sure is different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this new photo of Brad is absolutely wonderful. He looks really handsome. I normally don´t like QT´s movies because they´re very violent. But this movie sure is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligaya</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-135596</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-135596</guid>
		<description>I posted excerpts from new interview with critic Peter Travers (I think with Rolling Stone) for ABC News on the &quot;Today Show&quot; thread - includes how she protects the kids from tabloid stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted excerpts from new interview with critic Peter Travers (I think with Rolling Stone) for ABC News on the &#8220;Today Show&#8221; thread &#8211; includes how she protects the kids from tabloid stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligaya</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-141652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-141652</guid>
		<description>***CORRECTION*** &amp; REMINDER -

CHANGELING ALERT:

HBO will have “First Look: Changeling” TOMORROW, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2008.
HBO-W 7:15 pm PT
HBO-E 4:15 pm PT. 

On my Dish satellite HBO’s various channels start at 300. 

“First Look”  usually airs several times on HBO’s different channels. It’s a 15 minute behind the scenes look on set on the shoot, new &amp; different mini-interviews with Clintalina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***CORRECTION*** &amp; REMINDER -</p>
<p>CHANGELING ALERT:</p>
<p>HBO will have “First Look: Changeling” TOMORROW, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2008.<br />
HBO-W 7:15 pm PT<br />
HBO-E 4:15 pm PT. </p>
<p>On my Dish satellite HBO’s various channels start at 300. </p>
<p>“First Look”  usually airs several times on HBO’s different channels. It’s a 15 minute behind the scenes look on set on the shoot, new &amp; different mini-interviews with Clintalina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligaya</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-141670</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-141670</guid>
		<description>I’m pleading with all Jolie-Pitt fans to attend the 1st weekend in your city, even if you usually don’t go to the theater at all. The industry and viewers in general gauge a movie’s (and by extension, its stars’) success by the 1st weekend grosses. Gone are the days when a movie could stay for months or even over a year in the theaters – now movies are gone in a week if they don’t perform up to expectations. 

Success breeds success and good B.O. numbers &amp; word-of-mouth make people more interested in going. 

I think it was Cee who asked what we fans could do besides not buy the tabs. We can go to see Angie’s movies – one of the best ways to make the h8ters shut up temporarily is quote her per movie grosses and her lifetime gross. Those are numbers they can’t refute. They prove Angelina’s popularity and clout.  Angelina’s lifetime grosses = (24 films) $1,191,365,852. That’s $1.2 BILLION. (All figures from boxofficemojo.)  

Oscar analysts said a better AMH B.O. could have been the tipping point for Angie’s Oscar nomination. The Academy likes arty stuff – but with financial success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m pleading with all Jolie-Pitt fans to attend the 1st weekend in your city, even if you usually don’t go to the theater at all. The industry and viewers in general gauge a movie’s (and by extension, its stars’) success by the 1st weekend grosses. Gone are the days when a movie could stay for months or even over a year in the theaters – now movies are gone in a week if they don’t perform up to expectations. </p>
<p>Success breeds success and good B.O. numbers &amp; word-of-mouth make people more interested in going. </p>
<p>I think it was Cee who asked what we fans could do besides not buy the tabs. We can go to see Angie’s movies – one of the best ways to make the h8ters shut up temporarily is quote her per movie grosses and her lifetime gross. Those are numbers they can’t refute. They prove Angelina’s popularity and clout.  Angelina’s lifetime grosses = (24 films) $1,191,365,852. That’s $1.2 BILLION. (All figures from boxofficemojo.)  </p>
<p>Oscar analysts said a better AMH B.O. could have been the tipping point for Angie’s Oscar nomination. The Academy likes arty stuff – but with financial success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neer</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-145396</link>
		<dc:creator>neer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-145396</guid>
		<description>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-10-19/shes-actually-smart/1/

She&#039;s Actually Smart
by Nancy Collins

Angelina wows a crowd of human rights bigwigs with a kick-ass speech on war crimes, child soldiers and global justice. 

“Angelina’s full of surprises,” said legendary profiler Lillian Ross, who was shadowing the actress for a New Yorker piece last Friday afternoon at the Council on Foreign Relations. 

“She doesn’t miss a thing. She’s one of a kind, not only with the six kids—she’s a real working mom—but her intelligence, understanding, humor. And, of course, there’s the beauty. Clint Eastwood says when you look at her up close you realize she has the most beautiful face on earth.”

Jennifer Aniston really didn’t stand a chance. Neither did most who heard Jolie deliver the introductory remarks for a panel on Darfur at an elegant international law and justice symposium sponsored by the Jolie-Pitt Foundation. She spoke alongside Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court, and New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof. It was the final presentation of a decidedly high-wonk day.

It began at noon with the activist actress hobnobbing with General Wesley Clark, Nick Rostow, legal advisor to the political elite, and Greg Craig, the defense attorney who represented would-be Reagan assassin John Hinkley. By the time Council President Richard Haass welcomed everyone, the actress, dressed for diplomatic success in black boots, skirt and blazer, was first row, front and center.
When a brand-name Hollywood personality attends such an event, it’s tempting (and often accurate) to dismiss their presence as good PR, a little star power to make the affair palatable to the popular media. Often at these sorts of things, the starlet delivers a few minutes of talking points while affecting a glamorous-yet-earnest pose. Folks were wondering if Jolie’s speech would show a well-intentioned woman well out of her league.

Over the course of five hours, as the attendees digested such light fare as “International Obligations Toward Victims of Mass Atrocities,” 

Jolie scribbled notes on a legal pad. When her turn came to speak, the room hushed and craned its collective neck. Human rights advocates, NGO staffers and Council members—people who live and breathe this subject matter—shifted in their seats to watch the celebrity approach the podium. 

Once there, Jolie began by citing the “remarkable education” of her seven years as Goodwill Ambassador to the United Nations, and her visits to 25 refugee camps. She then proceeded to eloquently make her case that too often, “peace is placed before justice, often times instead of it. I believe there’s no enduring peace without justice.”

Justice, as she put it, should not be “a luxury for only rich and wealthy nations. In far too many places I’ve been, I’ve seen refugees returned to live among the same people who attacked them,” the same people who remain in power by “threatening more violence if we attempt to bring them to justice. We let those who destroyed their country decide the future for it.

continued: “When crimes against humanity are punished consistently, the killers’ calculus will change. If they walk away, it sends a message that they need not worry. We need to arrest those indicted. Trials can change behavior.”

And finally, “After seven years in the field I have a lot to learn, but I do know that no mother who had her children killed in front of her, no young girl sold into slavery, no boy kidnapped and forced to be a child soldier, no young girl, like the three year old I saw with her limbs cut off, should be expected to forget. No one should have to choose between peace and justice.”

When the panel concluded, the actress, who was giving no interviews, was instantly surrounded by people who, in the name of world peace, had summoned up the courage to approach her for an autograph—not for themselves, you see, for their grandchildren. “Of course, I understand,” she replied, ever graciously, as the long fingers of her left hand scrawled her name across the programs. “I have kids, too.” Indeed. The most famous on the planet.

As Jolie left, Ted Sorenson, whom as JFK’s speechwriter spent a lot of time with the most famous brunette of that era, summed up his impression of the actress.
“Frankly, I came a skeptic,” he said, “but am leaving impressed.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-10-19/shes-actually-smart/1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-10-19/shes-actually-smart/1/</a></p>
<p>She&#8217;s Actually Smart<br />
by Nancy Collins</p>
<p>Angelina wows a crowd of human rights bigwigs with a kick-ass speech on war crimes, child soldiers and global justice. </p>
<p>“Angelina’s full of surprises,” said legendary profiler Lillian Ross, who was shadowing the actress for a New Yorker piece last Friday afternoon at the Council on Foreign Relations. </p>
<p>“She doesn’t miss a thing. She’s one of a kind, not only with the six kids—she’s a real working mom—but her intelligence, understanding, humor. And, of course, there’s the beauty. Clint Eastwood says when you look at her up close you realize she has the most beautiful face on earth.”</p>
<p>Jennifer Aniston really didn’t stand a chance. Neither did most who heard Jolie deliver the introductory remarks for a panel on Darfur at an elegant international law and justice symposium sponsored by the Jolie-Pitt Foundation. She spoke alongside Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court, and New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof. It was the final presentation of a decidedly high-wonk day.</p>
<p>It began at noon with the activist actress hobnobbing with General Wesley Clark, Nick Rostow, legal advisor to the political elite, and Greg Craig, the defense attorney who represented would-be Reagan assassin John Hinkley. By the time Council President Richard Haass welcomed everyone, the actress, dressed for diplomatic success in black boots, skirt and blazer, was first row, front and center.<br />
When a brand-name Hollywood personality attends such an event, it’s tempting (and often accurate) to dismiss their presence as good PR, a little star power to make the affair palatable to the popular media. Often at these sorts of things, the starlet delivers a few minutes of talking points while affecting a glamorous-yet-earnest pose. Folks were wondering if Jolie’s speech would show a well-intentioned woman well out of her league.</p>
<p>Over the course of five hours, as the attendees digested such light fare as “International Obligations Toward Victims of Mass Atrocities,” </p>
<p>Jolie scribbled notes on a legal pad. When her turn came to speak, the room hushed and craned its collective neck. Human rights advocates, NGO staffers and Council members—people who live and breathe this subject matter—shifted in their seats to watch the celebrity approach the podium. </p>
<p>Once there, Jolie began by citing the “remarkable education” of her seven years as Goodwill Ambassador to the United Nations, and her visits to 25 refugee camps. She then proceeded to eloquently make her case that too often, “peace is placed before justice, often times instead of it. I believe there’s no enduring peace without justice.”</p>
<p>Justice, as she put it, should not be “a luxury for only rich and wealthy nations. In far too many places I’ve been, I’ve seen refugees returned to live among the same people who attacked them,” the same people who remain in power by “threatening more violence if we attempt to bring them to justice. We let those who destroyed their country decide the future for it.</p>
<p>continued: “When crimes against humanity are punished consistently, the killers’ calculus will change. If they walk away, it sends a message that they need not worry. We need to arrest those indicted. Trials can change behavior.”</p>
<p>And finally, “After seven years in the field I have a lot to learn, but I do know that no mother who had her children killed in front of her, no young girl sold into slavery, no boy kidnapped and forced to be a child soldier, no young girl, like the three year old I saw with her limbs cut off, should be expected to forget. No one should have to choose between peace and justice.”</p>
<p>When the panel concluded, the actress, who was giving no interviews, was instantly surrounded by people who, in the name of world peace, had summoned up the courage to approach her for an autograph—not for themselves, you see, for their grandchildren. “Of course, I understand,” she replied, ever graciously, as the long fingers of her left hand scrawled her name across the programs. “I have kids, too.” Indeed. The most famous on the planet.</p>
<p>As Jolie left, Ted Sorenson, whom as JFK’s speechwriter spent a lot of time with the most famous brunette of that era, summed up his impression of the actress.<br />
“Frankly, I came a skeptic,” he said, “but am leaving impressed.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rach</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-144727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-144727</guid>
		<description>still can&#039;t get over how hot he looks here..phewee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still can&#8217;t get over how hot he looks here..phewee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neer</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-142500</link>
		<dc:creator>neer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-142500</guid>
		<description>No matter how many stones that the haters will throw at Angie, whether big or small stones, she remains unaffected as she makes herself busy with what is important: FAMILY, HUMANITARIAN WORK, CAREER. In fact, for each stone, it becomes somewhat her weapon and making her stronger everyday to do what she has to do. It challenges her even more to always have a sense of purpose and be useful to what matters most.

She puts her energy to what is relevant instead of minding the negative things that are said about her. She surrounds herself with POSITIVE PEOPLE. People who support or help her on the causes she’s passionate about. Her family who inspires &amp; love her dearly. Her directors, co-actors &amp; crews who respect her. Her supporters &amp; fans who admire her work &amp; believe her advocacy.

As what she said before, she knows the DIFFERENCE OF WHAT IS IMPORTANT &amp; URGENT FROM WHAT IS SUPERFICIAL &amp; TRIVIAL. So, with this in mind, we are assured that Angie will always come out all right as she knows her priorities in life &amp; finds strength from proper sources. That we believe positive people &amp; things outweigh the negative ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how many stones that the haters will throw at Angie, whether big or small stones, she remains unaffected as she makes herself busy with what is important: FAMILY, HUMANITARIAN WORK, CAREER. In fact, for each stone, it becomes somewhat her weapon and making her stronger everyday to do what she has to do. It challenges her even more to always have a sense of purpose and be useful to what matters most.</p>
<p>She puts her energy to what is relevant instead of minding the negative things that are said about her. She surrounds herself with POSITIVE PEOPLE. People who support or help her on the causes she’s passionate about. Her family who inspires &amp; love her dearly. Her directors, co-actors &amp; crews who respect her. Her supporters &amp; fans who admire her work &amp; believe her advocacy.</p>
<p>As what she said before, she knows the DIFFERENCE OF WHAT IS IMPORTANT &amp; URGENT FROM WHAT IS SUPERFICIAL &amp; TRIVIAL. So, with this in mind, we are assured that Angie will always come out all right as she knows her priorities in life &amp; finds strength from proper sources. That we believe positive people &amp; things outweigh the negative ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligaya</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-142610</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-142610</guid>
		<description>The fanboys at rottentomatoes are all excited about this photo.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/inglourious_basterds/news/1762570/tarantinos_inglourious_basterds_not_a_typo

Tarantino&#039;s &quot;Inglourious Basterds&quot; Not a Typo
New synopsis and confirmed title as production commences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fanboys at rottentomatoes are all excited about this photo.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/inglourious_basterds/news/1762570/tarantinos_inglourious_basterds_not_a_typo" rel="nofollow">http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/inglourious_basterds/news/1762570/tarantinos_inglourious_basterds_not_a_typo</a></p>
<p>Tarantino&#8217;s &#8220;Inglourious Basterds&#8221; Not a Typo<br />
New synopsis and confirmed title as production commences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarahc</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-142394</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-142394</guid>
		<description>If good positive articles were written on both the Jolie-Pitt&#039;s they would not be able to sell their trash to the public.  My thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If good positive articles were written on both the Jolie-Pitt&#8217;s they would not be able to sell their trash to the public.  My thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gena</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/comment-page-2/#comment-145028</link>
		<dc:creator>gena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-in-inglorious-basterds-first-photo/#comment-145028</guid>
		<description>He is so handsome, that is a beautiful shot of him. Thanks for the good article written on Brad. Now if only they would write some good accurate ones on Angie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is so handsome, that is a beautiful shot of him. Thanks for the good article written on Brad. Now if only they would write some good accurate ones on Angie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

