On the other hand, we now know that being a BRANDGELINA FAN can be a hazardous occupation or hobby which ever you chose. See what happen to good gal Christine only few minutes spent on TV and tadah! Anti-Brangelina had her crucified (only using a metaphor here!)

And yeah, Brad Pitt Dare say “He’s Happy!”

lol up yours Oprah!

Still, when Lainey talked about the article, she emphasized Brad also being a “media manipulator.” She also emphasized that Brad and Angie aren’t the only ones who do it, but that all celebrities do it. It’s just that apparently, the JPs do it very well.

I think to an extent, all celebs try to control what’s put out about them, especially because lies are usually printed about them. Somehow, they’ve to negate those. But at the same time, I don’t think they’re any less of a human, and I think the NY Times article paints Angie as a very superficial celeb despite what she has accomplished out of genuine passion. It’s these kinds of articles that people only see these celebrities as mere celebs, either to be idolized or despised, and also, when they’re reduced to their profession (and not seen as human beings), it gives a lot of people even more reason to feel entitled to “invade” the celeb’s privacy.

I think the article was really just one person’s opinion, and naming unnamed sources and trying to piece together what she thinks Angie’s “crafted” image. It’s just another take on Angie’s image … almost very tab-like. And, awards season is coming up, so, it’s pretty suspicious that yet another article paints Angie in a negative light is out.

At least, there are blogs that are praising Angie’s smarts for being to do things on her own without the help of PR firms.

Also, I am glad to hear that Angie has a boarding school somewhere in Africa. I didn’t know about it, and I guess, the girls at the school are doing very well.

I usually like Lainey too, but she can be off at times.

yoco, I know. Even Lainey’s painted Christina in a bad light. I like Lainey, but this time, I’m very irritated.

I do feel bad for Christina because blogs are saying she’s crazy. Sheesh. I think she’s getting an unfair judgment. Besides, she was only on for a few minutes. I feel the gossip blogs are much worse because they propagate a lot of tabloid fodder and dispense personal info about the celebrities.

It is weird that a stranger would know those details, but at the same time, she’s a fan, who clearly supports his projects (i.e. Make It Right). I don’t think she was being stalkerish. She just asked about his tattoos, not about his sex life. Besides, I think Brad took it in good stride. He may have been a bit weirded out, but I think he was okay with her in the end.

The earlier reports said he talked about Pax and Time out chair.

Maybe they edited that out :(
It was funny the way it was told.