<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brad Pitt on Rolling Stone cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/</link>
	<description>Crushable gives you the celebrity news, style and scoop on the stuff you care about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:35:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliepittfanatic</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-142639</link>
		<dc:creator>joliepittfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-142639</guid>
		<description>STILL UNDER MOD- My one beef about Brad&#039;s interview with the Phillipine Daily Inquirer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STILL UNDER MOD- My one beef about Brad&#8217;s interview with the Phillipine Daily Inquirer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliepittfanatic</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-144222</link>
		<dc:creator>joliepittfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144222</guid>
		<description>Sarita, excellent post! That was exactly what I was trying to explain in my post about how our differing opinions make the &quot;triangle&quot; a touchy subject for most of us. You, however, said it much better than I did!

I also want to add a bit to what you said about how it&#039;s obvious that Brad and Angie didn&#039;t get physical with each other until the divorce was final, because I know that comment is bound to raise some eyebrows due to the timing of Shiloh&#039;s conception.

If you do the Math, sweet Shi was likely concieved at the end of August or beginning of September 2006 (I am of the belief that Shi was actually due in early June. There were rumors going around that she was, and she was born by planned C-section due to being breech. Planned C-sections are usually performed one to two weeks before the due date to prevent the mother from going into labor, so I&#039;m inclined to believe that the rumors about the early June due date were true).

A judge signed off on Brad and JA&#039;s divorce in August. After that they just had to get through the mandatory two-month California waiting period, hence the October announcement of the divorce being final. For all practical purposes, however, the divorce was techincally finalized in August.

All of that said, I agree with sarita&#039;s comment about Brad and Angie telling the world when they first slept together. When it comes down to it, that&#039;s what they&#039;d have to do to confirm to everyone that they didn&#039;t get physical until the divorce was final (and even then, some nay-sayers would be saying that they were lying).

However, when they first slept together is nobody&#039;s business but their own! I mean, really, that&#039;s about as nosey as you can get, IMO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarita, excellent post! That was exactly what I was trying to explain in my post about how our differing opinions make the &#8220;triangle&#8221; a touchy subject for most of us. You, however, said it much better than I did!</p>
<p>I also want to add a bit to what you said about how it&#8217;s obvious that Brad and Angie didn&#8217;t get physical with each other until the divorce was final, because I know that comment is bound to raise some eyebrows due to the timing of Shiloh&#8217;s conception.</p>
<p>If you do the Math, sweet Shi was likely concieved at the end of August or beginning of September 2006 (I am of the belief that Shi was actually due in early June. There were rumors going around that she was, and she was born by planned C-section due to being breech. Planned C-sections are usually performed one to two weeks before the due date to prevent the mother from going into labor, so I&#8217;m inclined to believe that the rumors about the early June due date were true).</p>
<p>A judge signed off on Brad and JA&#8217;s divorce in August. After that they just had to get through the mandatory two-month California waiting period, hence the October announcement of the divorce being final. For all practical purposes, however, the divorce was techincally finalized in August.</p>
<p>All of that said, I agree with sarita&#8217;s comment about Brad and Angie telling the world when they first slept together. When it comes down to it, that&#8217;s what they&#8217;d have to do to confirm to everyone that they didn&#8217;t get physical until the divorce was final (and even then, some nay-sayers would be saying that they were lying).</p>
<p>However, when they first slept together is nobody&#8217;s business but their own! I mean, really, that&#8217;s about as nosey as you can get, IMO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliepittfanatic</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-144275</link>
		<dc:creator>joliepittfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144275</guid>
		<description>UNDER MOD- Brad left out Knox and Viv when he was discussing the countries the kids are from in the interview chi jong linked....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNDER MOD- Brad left out Knox and Viv when he was discussing the countries the kids are from in the interview chi jong linked&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliepittfanatic</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-144217</link>
		<dc:creator>joliepittfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144217</guid>
		<description>chi jong- Thanks for sharing! So now it is confirmed. Sweet Shi is indeed in CCOB! However, one thing bothered me about that interview. Brad said the following at one point: &quot;I look down and there’s our boy from Vietnam, our daughter from Ethiopia, our girl who was born in Namibia, our son who’s from Cambodia and they are brothers and sisters, man.&quot;

Ordinarily I&#039;d be making comments about how sweet that is, but he made a major boo-boo in my opinion. He left out Knox and Viv. No where did he say, &quot;our girl and boy who were born in France,&quot; or &quot;our daughter and son who were born in France&quot;. I&#039;m also rather surprised he did that, as Brad seems to try to include all of his kids when discussing them in interviews (usually by saying &quot;the kids...&quot; or &quot;they...&quot; or &quot;We&#039;re all....&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chi jong- Thanks for sharing! So now it is confirmed. Sweet Shi is indeed in CCOB! However, one thing bothered me about that interview. Brad said the following at one point: &#8220;I look down and there’s our boy from Vietnam, our daughter from Ethiopia, our girl who was born in Namibia, our son who’s from Cambodia and they are brothers and sisters, man.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ordinarily I&#8217;d be making comments about how sweet that is, but he made a major boo-boo in my opinion. He left out Knox and Viv. No where did he say, &#8220;our girl and boy who were born in France,&#8221; or &#8220;our daughter and son who were born in France&#8221;. I&#8217;m also rather surprised he did that, as Brad seems to try to include all of his kids when discussing them in interviews (usually by saying &#8220;the kids&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;they&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;We&#8217;re all&#8230;.&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neela</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-148036</link>
		<dc:creator>Neela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-148036</guid>
		<description>sarita, i wish you would post your thoughts more often. you explained your thoughts very well. great insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sarita, i wish you would post your thoughts more often. you explained your thoughts very well. great insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neela</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-144464</link>
		<dc:creator>Neela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144464</guid>
		<description>DT, good point about honor being important to Brad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DT, good point about honor being important to Brad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligaya</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-141192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-141192</guid>
		<description>Please go to parade.com/personality and vote for angie as a screen legend-in-the-making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please go to parade.com/personality and vote for angie as a screen legend-in-the-making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarahc</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-5/#comment-144699</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144699</guid>
		<description>Has anyone considered the fact of JA moving on with her life has included several so called boy friends, but yet no long term relationships.  If JA is America&#039;s girl next door.  The door is very difficult one to open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone considered the fact of JA moving on with her life has included several so called boy friends, but yet no long term relationships.  If JA is America&#8217;s girl next door.  The door is very difficult one to open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliepittfanatic</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-4/#comment-144650</link>
		<dc:creator>joliepittfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144650</guid>
		<description>UNDER MOD- My explanation of what I meant when I defended JA&#039;s comment about the kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNDER MOD- My explanation of what I meant when I defended JA&#8217;s comment about the kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joliepittfanatic</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/comment-page-4/#comment-144649</link>
		<dc:creator>joliepittfanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittwatch.com/brad-pitt-on-rolling-stone-cover/#comment-144649</guid>
		<description>Susan, I never said that it&#039;s okay for JA to make a joke involving the kids. I was just trying to point out that I don&#039;t think she meant anything bad by it, and I don&#039;t think she made that quote as a way to hurt Brad and Angie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, I never said that it&#8217;s okay for JA to make a joke involving the kids. I was just trying to point out that I don&#8217;t think she meant anything bad by it, and I don&#8217;t think she made that quote as a way to hurt Brad and Angie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

