Comments on: David Beckham laughs off rumors of co-starring in Armani campaign with Angelina Jolie

By: Sami

Sami — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 03:46:36 +0000

JACKIE- Stay at your own fan site or would you prefer that I go bash the Beckhams on their fan site? Why must you bash one person as a rally for another? I think its perfectly possible to admire both parties.

By: joliepittfanatic

joliepittfanatic — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:31:33 +0000

jackie- It’s fine that you like the Beckhams. Just keep in mind that this is a Brad and Angelina fansite, not a Beckham fansite. Fine if you want to share your thoughts regarding the Beckhams’ side of this interview. However, if you are going to bash Angie (it’s very obvious that you really don’t like her), then please realize that we fans ARE going to defend her!

By: joliepittfanatic

joliepittfanatic — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 04:28:09 +0000

Veski- Unless you have insider information, you don’t know that David cheated on his wife. That was just a rumor in a tabloid. Nothing was ever said about it in more reputable sources. Also, Victoria obviously stood by David through the rumors, something I doubt she’d have done if they were true.

Like Cassie said, if you believe those rumors, do you believe all the rumors that have gone around for the past four plus years about Angie and Brad cheating on each other?

By: 007

007 — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:22:47 +0000

L o u A n n – the idea doesn’t exactly come naturally to me either (the underwear-thing) :) I just perceived the comment as Angie being in an ad (any ad) with this-or-that-person who in some way might “bring down her status” because he/she is by some considered C-list in the US or North America. Hence the third paragraph (sounds like I’m referring to legislative texts… =P ).

What I meant was that, regardless of the Armani ad being for the US market alone, an international campaign or for another country/region (like Brad’s beer and cellphone commercials) – why would it matter who she’s with… There are people more famous in one place, but not so well known in another… (i.e. Brad and the ex Sumowrestler). It still works. That being said I don’t know which market that particular Armani ad is intended for. But I understand where you’re coming from – stressing the half-nakedness and draping herself over some other guy. I got ya’! And have no views on that :)

I agree with you as for the fact that Angie’s got much better things going on in her life, other than an Armani pants flash. If you’d have to prioritize… it’s apparent what’d come last.

Thanks for the info on The Lost City of Z! I’ve seen pictures of parts of El Yunque National Forest – very beautiful. Great alternative if that’s what’s holding them up! But depending on if they’d like the typical ruins or Inca-type cities in the scenes, it’d be more practical with the Amazon-area. More stuff that Hollywood movies are made of I suppose… Nobody’s said much about that project though… Just me ranting on about it because I’d like to see Brad in a classic adventure flick. We’ll just have to wait and see on that one – if it ever materializes.

Auf wiedersehen!

By: miss

miss — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:15:01 +0000

Oh Jackie, you are so funny! Since when did Jolie become unpopular? And puhlease, Jolie doesn’t need to use somebody just to be on the headline because for your information, they’re always on the headlines whether they like it or not and puhlease, if they will use somebody, it wouldn’t be the Becks, i mean, why would the most powerful woman alive use someone who’s less famous than her? Think about it. Even Beckham’s charm didn’t help his career in america so he’s moving somewhere to rebuild his career back. Talking about who’s becoming unpopular. If you think Jolie can’t sell anything, how much more the Becks? It’s so funny because Beckham used to be a respectable athlete but now he’s only famous for his underwear ads. And for your information, Jolie came up on the recent poll to be the most desirable by both male and female. The next time you post something rubbish, make sure you do your research.

By: Veski

Veski — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:58:31 +0000

I have to agree with “LAINEYGOSSIP” comment on Beck and Armani story:

No, because he’s married
Big surprise.

The UK tabloids reported something and it turned out to be wrong. Shocking, non?

Last week they put out a story about David Beckham posing with Angelina Jolie for Armani underwear. Becks has now denied the claim on the grounds that…

He’s married!

“You know (Angelina) wouldn’t do it and I wouldn’t do it. At the end of the day, I wouldn’t do it because I’m married.”

So marriage didn’t stop him from cheating on his wife. But it will stop him from posing with the world’s most desirable woman for an ad campaign.

Please.

There is no f-cking way Victoria would have let that happen.

My favourite though are the responses to the story on the Us Weekly comment section – this one in particular:

Oh I love him even more..what a gentleman!!

Snort.

By: jackie

jackie — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:40:32 +0000

Mary ann-If read my other comments you would see that i’m a fan of the Beckhams.And I’m responding to what i saw here ,concerning the Beckhams ,is that o.k ? So if you don’t want to hear from me in the future don’t mention the Beckhams.

By: kimmy

kimmy — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:31:06 +0000

for LG: is it the one with Angie wearing a dress and a hat..?? she’s 7 at that time.. or is it the one when she was just only two years old??

this is when Angie was 7, i put a shiloh pic too beside her pic..
http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m135/KIM_01_03/angie-shiloh.jpg

i just don’t like people go to this site and say things stupid things about Angie or Brad or their family.. gee.. you are on the wrong site! if you don’t like them don’t read and go to sites like pittwatch..

By: Mary Ann

Mary Ann — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:39:43 +0000

Jackie, if you are “no fan of Jolie-Pitt” and “how unpopular Jolie is with woman” could you explain to me why would you come to this website? Guess it must be because you enjoy making comments that you know will upset people. You really need just comment at Just Jared where others who h*te the Jolie-Pitts are.

By: jackie

jackie — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:39:58 +0000

Lou ann- If i’m silly imagine what you sound like.I’m no fan of jolie-pitt ,i’m only commenting on the story, and the only thing i’m saying is that it was Beckham who was first to shoot down the idea .And he’s getting heat for saying it’s because he’s married.The Beckhams are not dying to be linked to Jolie , that’s my point.I think a lot of you are in denial about just how unpopular Jolie is among women .I don’t think she could sell anything, stick to acting and leave Becks coattails alone.