Subscribe
Previous Post
Tomorrow morning the 2010 Emmy nominations will be announced, and there are some obvious shoe-ins: Glee and Modern Family will probably pick up nods for best new series, Lost‘s two-hour epic finale is going to get something, and we’re pretty sure either James Franco or Julianne Moore (or both!) will place for Best Guest Star after their cameos on 30 Rock (30 Rock always gets the best cameos). For the most part, these people and shows deserve the recognition. But there are just some Emmy contenders that we can totally bet on being on that list, despite totally sucking. Like:
Matthew Fox
Gawker put Matthew Fox on its list of “Emmy Nominees We Can Only Dream Of” but he has been nominated for Lost before. Also, he is the worst and cheated on his wife with a stripper, which shouldn’t factor into his nomination, but if we had our way, it would. Just give Michael Emerson the statue again. It’s okay, there’s a reason he keeps getting the awards: Ben Linus was the best.
Co-signed all across the board, well said.
Especially about Charlie Sheen-it’s really fine that everyone else(not me) loves the show, it’s been on a while, etc. But an Emmy? Really? It makes me feel as if there’s so much “reality” TV on that the pool of actual(non reality) shows to choose Emmy nominees from must be getting really, really small.
I agree with the Charlie Sheen one so much. I am so sick of Hollywood rewarding this gross wife abuser and paying him more and more money to make his terrible, unfunny show. Stop the insanity!