They were just being honest, IMO. I mean, unfourtnately, the “Team” thing IS a con for Angie. Some h8ters STILL refuse to realize that it’s been four years, and shun her because of the whole “triangle” business.

Celeb TV, unfourtnately, gets a lot of their “news” from the tabs, so I’m guessing they just picked up the “story” from whichever tab it was that first printed it. Also, the tabs have printed lies about Angie’s weight before (i.e, that she has an eating disorder, that her weight loss is due to a deadly diease, that she’s doing some sort of weird diet to lose weight, etc.).

They also used the diet angle last month, when they claimed that Angie was on a special diet to help her concieve Baby number 7 before the twins’ first birthday.

Basically, unless it’s reported in PEOPLE, I wouldn’t worry about it! :)

Angela- I agree with you about how the media shouldn’t be comparing celeb kids, especially based on looks. However, I also want to point out that, ordinarily, we actually don’t see that much of Suri. The reason we saw so much of her this past summer, fall, and a good portion of the winter was because she and her parents were in New York due to Katie’s Broadway play (All My Sons).

When the Cruises are in LA (like they are now) or Telluride Colorade, we often go quite awhile between Suri sightings. Lately we have been seeing new photos of her about once a week, if even that.

http://www.pittwatch.com/pittwatch-comment-policy/

It explains how moderation works. :)

dhc – I’ll be completely honest. I have NO IDEA how the ranking works. I guess they’ll work out averages or something? But I know nothing about the inner workings of it, it’s a bit odd.

joliepittfanatic, i have nothing against you and i’m not bothered that you brought that article here, i just wanted to share my thought and opinion about that poll. sorry if you think it’s offensive. peace out. :)