Skip to content
Sun, Jul 29 2007

“I Know Who Killed Me” Reviews

"I Know who Killed Me" is getting slaughtered at the box office and in reviews.

Now, I do have to say the focus is on how bad the movie is, not on Lindsay Lohan. They actually say she made it possible to put the movie in theatres – with anyone else, it would have gone straight to DVD.

Lindsay Lohan is trying to break her mold of child actor movies, so took on this very gory almost B-rated horror movie to do so. Maybe it worked for that, but it was not a movie that showcased her talent. And, after Georgia Rule, Bobby and Chapter 27 – you’d think she could choose something better.

New York Daily News – half a star:

No review could really do justice to the monumental trashiness of this mess; it really has to be seen to be believed.

New York Post – 0 stars:

sleazy, inept and worthless piece of torture porn

New York Times:

Pretentious and inane, “I Know Who Killed Me” arouses unexpected sympathy for its embattled star.

Associated Press:

Ridiculous is the word that more often comes to mind… It makes you wonder what Lohan was thinking when she said yes to this project.

Hollywood Reporter:

There’s a fresh candidate in the running for worst movie of 2007 honors.

Via rotten tomatoes Tags: , , ,

Share This Post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
Entertainment

Comments

  1. By Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

    alright,i have to say something in defense of miss Lohan and this movie,to clear out the negativity of that longisland hater fella.i have to give some major props to Lindsay,in her getting this movie made.in addition to shooting this movie on a tight schedule,low budget,stalkerazzi spies all over the set,intense media scrutiny,in rehab and battling her demons,family problems,Lindsay was suffering from an infected appendix wound,which was messy and aching,and continuing to shoot her scenes with this condition.this team-player work ethic was commented on positively by the director,chris silverston,in an interview on horror site,bloody-disgusting.com.i find it disgusting that the hater media NEVER has anything good to say about Lindsay,they just point out her bad decisions,flaws,and all that rumor crap.thats why all movie critics should walk the plank,f’n wankers.the entire media establishment should be sent over to iraq to clear ieds and minefields,since they serve no purpose other than senseless hate and drivel.get well,miss Lohan.love always,a huge fan.peace

  2. By Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

    longislansxcdumbass….what a wanker!!! you wouldn’t know good cinema if freddie chased you down elm street,and made you choose between gigli and titannic,while yelling ‘welcome to prime time,beeotch!!!’ just another hater with a serious debt to karma.how did you end up here?get lost on your way between hate-celeb sites?well,get a move on then,longislandicet,don’t let the doggie door hurt your posterior,lol.peace

  3. By LongIslandhXc

    At first i thought it would be gratifying to see lindsay get tortured, but i found myself feeling envious of her during those moments. until I saw this movie, i thought 28 days later was the worst movie i’d ever seen in a theater. roger corman has nothing on the writer and director of this movie because this was the worst I have ever seen.

  4. By Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

    i always get distracted by thoughts of the incomparable miss Lindsay Lohan.i meant to say in the comment above that this movie finished in the top ten movies,no.9, with 3.4 million in estimated revenue,meaning all weekend reciepts were not in when this figure was announced sunday night,and that it did meet its expected opening number of 2-4 million,and on 1320 screens no less.(the simpsons were on 4,350 screens)the two times i saw this movie over the weekend,the theater was pretty full,and the crowd had a somewhat mixed reaction,after all,this movie is pretty gory,lots of f-bombs,sex,blood,violence,suspense,what more could you want in a horror/thriller?!!!!!!! i’d say the movie did pretty good for a limited release,low-budget B-movie,bravo!!peace p.s. haters-i’m going to see it again,you wankers.

  5. By Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

    i fail to understand how the talking-heads can say that this excellent horror/thriller B-movie bombed.according to fangoria,this flick was filmed,promoted,and marketed for less than 5 million,only shown on 1320 screens,and only projected to pull in 2-4 million on opening weekend due to its hard-R rating for torture,nudity,language,and violence,which is hardly the recipe for blockbuster status.i found Lindsays adult-role performance,quite engaging and erotic,as well as suprising in the emotional and painful horror scenes.THIS YOUNG WOMAN CAN ACT and it would be a shame if she can’t get control of her demons,as they overshadow anything she does onscreen.these ‘critic’ buffoons probably didn’t even observe her performance,they just wanted to bash the movie and anything Lohan.i love you,miss Lohan,whether you are Cady Heron or Dakota Moss,so please get well,and we’ll see you back on the silver screen.love always,a huge fan.peace

  6. By dakota moss

    i love you,lindsay.get well,girl

  7. By Elizabeth

    oh… did ANY of you fans write this letter? if so, admit. I am curious. http://tob.hollywood.com/2007/07/30/a-linday-lohan-fan-speaks-out/

  8. By Elizabeth

    oh boy…. where is the betty ford clinic located anyway?

  9. By naty

    oh by the way, i’ll be in NY in about 3 weeks, lets see if i can see her ! hope soooo

  10. By naty

    Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often you rock!
    that’s exacltly what we need to do, support her and kick the haters butts!!

  11. By Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

    i have seen this movie twice and i like it for what it is-a low-budget homage to 80′s B-movies,with a variety of styles and color useage.it definitely has some unique moments and Lindsay is very erotic and sexy as the dancer,dakota.i see her in a very different light now and i am impressed by her willingness to take chances.i liked the story,even the ending,but wish that the director and editor had left a few more scenes in,instead of chopping it down to 1 hour,45 min?why is it that movie producers will make you sit for 3 hours(titannic) but will cut down other movies like this one?if this movie had retained a few more of the deleted scenes,i would have been much more enthusiastic,but i still liked this movie,especially the scenes with Lindsay,duh.anyway,the movie ‘critics’ suck studio butt,and sony pictures probably told all its paid hacks to bash the flick to get back at its troubled star.thats how hollywierd rolls,like a big high school ‘burn book’;rock the boat,you get blasted by the hater media ‘critics’.i plan to see this movie again just to spit in the eyes of the haters,and to show some more love for my favorite movie star,miss Lindsay Lohan.please get well and best of health and luck as you battle the demons.peace