One of the readers here at GilmoreGirlsNews left a very thoughtful comment on the recap for "The Prodigal Daughter Returns" – in general, the comments on this site are insightful and really great. I love it. You guys always make me think. This comment, in particular, has had me coming back to read it over and over, so I decided to bring it out and share it, to start a discussion.
Reader "viewer" had this to say (some parts edited out, bolding mine for emphasis):
one aspect of the close relationship between the two is Rory had never seen Lorelai as an impediment to her personal freedom, and we have all seen the episode where Lorelai herself tells Emily that she is Rory’s friend first, and her mother second.
All that is to say that no, I didn’t see the reunion as too easy. It was as inevitable as was the separation. Best friend or not, Rory was a young woman who had reached that point where she had to leave the nest, and go find her own way, both literally and figuratively, and even in the most loving families, the closest parent-child relationships, there has to come a time when the child clambers down from those parental arms and stands on her own feet, and each one of us does it in a different way, with our own individual measure or lack of drama and rebellion, and each parent reacts in their own way, but most understand that painful though it is, it is exactly what the goal of the whole process has been!
So Rory clambered down from Lorelai’s arms and claimed her own life and her own responsibility for it, and like many mothers, single or not, it was extremely painful for Lorelai.
Someone once said that there are two kinds of women, those who live for their spouse, and those who live for their children, and Lorelai seems to me to be a classic example of the latter, which, now that I think about it, may have been one factor in what many, myself included, perceive as Luke’s conflicted feelings about having children with Lorelai – after waiting for eight years to “get” her, with the understanding that since she already has a daughter, second place is the best he can ever hope for starting out of the gate, and we can’t blame him for wanting to think long and hard before handing the biggest chunk of her over to yet another someone else – even if the someone else would be his own child!
I think one of the reasons the show is so popular, and so talked about even after going off the air, is that there is no mother or daughter who cannot relate to at least some aspects of the relationships between Emily and Lorelai, Lorelai and Rory, indefinable yet palpably miasmic things that transcend culture and creed. Whether nightmare or idyll, dysfunction or delight, the relationship between mother and daughter is like no other, it is a story that never ceases to tell itself to those who live it, and all whose lives are touched by it, a story that the Gilmore Girls tells remarkably well for what appears at first glance to be essentially an hour-long sitcom!
I do think the re-appearance of Jess, or more significantly, his book, was, as you said earlier, something of a wake-up call, a reality check, for Rory, but I also think that her decision to return to school was just a natural progression. She had taken that big step, made that necessary separation from her mother that she had to make as part of growing up, and once she had done that, she was able to take that next step up the ladder of young adulthood and resume that close relationship with Lorelai, and resume her own personal aspirations and life goals, no longer as a child, but as a young woman!
Hopping over to the Luke and April subplot, I don’t think Luke wants to hide April from Lorelai so much as he wants to hide Lorelai from April, and at one point he says as much – he does not want April to be so dazzled by Lorelai that he fades into the background, his stolid affections, he feels, could be no match, in the eyes of a young girl, with the elemental force of nature that has so completely captured his own heart. He does not mind walking through the rest of life in Lorelai’s shadow, but when it comes to his daughter’s love, he wants to be the one who shines!
And, there is also an element of uncertainty on Luke’s part about his future with Lorelai, and this is more than understandable. If there is any chance that Lorelai is not going to be around for good, he does not want April to become attached to her, and then what happens if Lorelai decides to go run an inn in the South of France?… We are talking, after all, about Lorelai, and Luke does not know what she is liable to do now that her immediate parenting duties are past her any more than we do, nor frankly, any more than Lorelai herself does!
So, you can probably see why this comment has had me thinking and thinking. It really pulls together so many of the loose ends of the show, and in a way I hadn’t really considered before. Yes, Lorelai had been considering a big move in her life, but it was never resolved. So, there’s still a big "what if". And, in therms of the mother-daughter relationship, thinking of it in terms of Rory needing to leave the nest and make her own mistakes, and Lorelai knowing she has to do it, makes a lot more sense to me. It’s not so much about whether this was a big fight for them or not, but more than Rory needed to be her own woman.
So, thinking about things this way, I admit I have more respect for the whole series of events than I did before. I was always annoyed with Lorelai for being "immature" in her treatment of Rory during that time of her life, but really it was a strong stand that she made. One she knew she had to. She may not have done it out of the pain Rory’s decision caused her, but on what Rory’s decision showed her was necessary. So, perhaps it seemed the reunion was "easy" because the fight was not substantial – it was the natural end to a journey, more than anything.
Now, the whole April & Luke thing with Lorelai still nags at me in some ways, but perhaps we can discuss them now. What motivates Luke as a parent, and why is it necessary for him to stand on his own?
Image: used with permission by Newscom Tags: gilmore girls, lorelai gilmore, luke danes, rory gilmore, mother daughter, relationships






854 days ago
You are so right that Luke is hiding Lorelai from April, not the other way around. Very good insight! I don’t really understand it. Luke loves Lorelai. Maybe he feels as Lorelai does, that it’s too good, “too easy” as well. Maybe he doesn’t trust that it’s going to work out, because of failed relationships in the past. Maybe he feels that April is all his, not Lorelai’s. And he’s totally captivated by her, as you can see when he looks at her web page. Luke is just another tough guy-softie, and his newly found daughter has captured his heart.
Reply
854 days ago
i don’t mean to be mean or a jerk or anything, but i dunno i guess i am just so stubborn and set in my ways that i don’t care what anyone else says. haha ;)
i just have this perfect picture of luke and lorelai happily married with kids and ya know, the whole package. the fact that we didn’t even get to see them MARRIED was very upsetting to me. and yes, lorelai and rory were very close. the closet of the close, but i feel like lorelai has a big heart and there is enough room for luke, rory, and luke and lorelai’s kids.
and i don’t mean to be cynical or anything, but luke and lorelai didn’t get together forever because or else there wouldn’t be a show.
but this was very interesting to read and i appreciate you posting this. :)
Reply
853 days ago
Her thoughts on the fight being part of Rory having to grow up and leave the nest and Lorelai having to let her very much mirrors my own thoughts on the whole thing, but it was much better said than I ever could have and so very insightfully laid out.
I also have to agree with what she says about the Luke/April/Lorelai thing – it makes sense and it very typical Luke behaviour. Luke always strikes me as a sweet and emotional guy who doesn’t know how to deal with those emotions -and I think finding out he had a daughter was very overwhelming for him and that he needed the time to come to grips with it, but at the same time didn’t know where to begin. I also think her felt an overwhelming pride and love for this little girl and that when he realised that she actually liked him too he didnt want to lose that. To me his whole behaviour seemed to be the classic reaction of someone inept at dealing with emotions and afraid of loosing this wonderful thing he felt he had been given and wasn’t worthy of. I think he felt that Lorelai is a natural parent and would be much better at this whole thing and instead of asking for her help and advice he shut her out because he was afraid that she’s take over and he’d lose-out. And at the same time he was so wrapped up in this that he could not see what this was doing to Lorelai. I believe that as a parent you need to do what is best for your child no matter what, and I also think that Luke though that he was doing what was best for April as in his warped thinking he figured that Lorelai taking over would make him insignificant and that if things went wrong April would be left behind and left with a person who she now didn’t care about as much. That she would be left with the lesser person as it where. What Luke didn’t think of however is that first of all he needs to trust in his relationship with April and also in his relationship with Lorelai. He also forgot that first and foremost Lorelai cares deeply about him and would give him the space with his daughter and wouldn’t take over. He also didn’t think about how much Lorelai could enrich both their lives -regardless of whether she would be around of ever or not. After-all there are no certainties or absolutes in life, and April is 12, and he and Lorelai were engaged, if it wasn’t for this they would have married, his behaviour was the destructive element, completely understandable, but still the destructive element that caused that break-up. I completely understand parents not wanting their kid to get attached to a fling or a short term lover, but if you’ve been together for longer than a year and if you are engaged to be married I think the relationship is stable enough to introduce into the life of your kid. And sabotaging your relationship like Luke did under the premise of “it might not last” is self destructive and makes you a martyr, unhappy and therefor not a better parent (as your child feels it when you are unhappy, which is not god for the child).
Reply
853 days ago
God, sorry for the unbelievably long and rambling post!!!
Reply