Subscribe
While Mischa Barton was on vacation in Australia, there were a couple of incidents where she was sunbathing without her top. Unfortunately, a very very aggressive paparazzi was stalking her. And he got some very unflattering images of her topless and showing cellulite on her thighs and whatnot (probably made worse from towel marks).
Anyway, it erupted into a big "thing", as it should. The photos appeared on magazines and were published over and over again.
The photographer, Jamie Fawcett, has been accused of harassing Mischa Barton. Fawcett went to Hamilton Island and is claimed to have take photos inside her private hotel room. He says she was in broad public view, but a zoom lens can get you off on not technically trespassing. Jamie Fawcett claims that he "had to" take the photographs.
Mischa Barton confronted Jamie Fawcett at the Hamilton Island airport, where they were booked on the same flight. She got very mad at him, asking "how [he] could do this to [her]"
"He’s a ridiculous human being … I’ve never abhorred anyone more,"
So, was Mischa Barton in a private space, or a public space? Should she have erred on the safe side and left her top on?
More "Event to Prevent" Photos here.
Image: used with permission by Newscom Tags: mischa barton, mischa barton topless, mischa barton nude, paparazzi, mischa barton photos, vacation, hamilton island
She was in a private place!
Normally you could’t see on her balcony, he has a zoomer on his photographer.
It’s like you take your binoculars and watch!
That’s the same thing, and if you would do this that would be pervy!
I hope you guys can understand what I’m saying
But Mischa’s reaction is fantastic, she couldn’t have handeld it better!
xx
[...] Barton and her publicity team have issued more public statements about the unattractive photos of Mischa that were taken by a paparazzi while she was on vacation in Australia. The photos, though [...]