<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss">

<channel>
	<title>Crushable &#187; chapter 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushable.com/tag/chapter-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushable.com</link>
	<description>Crushable gives you the celebrity news, style and scoop on the stuff you care about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:26:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are you tired of Lindsay Lohan?</title>
		<link>http://crushable.com/entertainment/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/</link>
		<comments>http://crushable.com/entertainment/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arieanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 27]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dina Lohan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lohangroupie.com/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a research poll conducted by E-Poll Market Research, which provides "appeal" rankings of 4,500 celebrities, Lindsay Lohan may be "overexposed." In fact, Dina Lohan is ranked as overexposed as well.

The research firm takes stock of which celebrities are grating on the public - celebrities termed "overexposed" are often too much in the public eye, which can breed contempt. The average "appeal" ranking for the term "overexposed" for celebrities at the peak of their careers is from 3-7% of... <a href="http://crushable.com/entertainment/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/">More &#187;</a><p>Post from: <a href="http://crushable.com">Crushable</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crushable.com/chapter-27-updates/"><img height="307" border="0" width="204" style="margin: 5px; float: right" alt="" src="http://cdn.crushable.com/files/2008/03/ll-smiling.jpg" /></a>According to a research poll <a href="http://www.forbes.com/media/2008/11/13/lohan-hilton-simpson-biz-media-cx_lr_1113overexposed.html">conducted</a> by <a href="http://www.epollresearch.com/corp/home.view;jsessionid=C840B0CAA9BD139E60210B70F631C9A5.tomcat2">E-Poll Market Research,</a> which provides &#8220;appeal&#8221; rankings of 4,500 celebrities, <strong>Lindsay Lohan may be &#8220;overexposed.&#8221; </strong>In fact, Dina Lohan is ranked as overexposed as well.</p>
<p>The research firm takes stock of which celebrities are grating on the public &#8211; celebrities termed &#8220;overexposed&#8221; are often <strong>too much in the public eye</strong>, which can breed contempt. The average &#8220;appeal&#8221; ranking for the term &#8220;overexposed&#8221; for celebrities at the peak of their careers is from 3-7% of those polled (of the 46 &#8220;appeal&#8221; terms available). For some perspective, 65% of the US population polled found that both Britney Spears &#038; Paris Hilton were overexposed. That&#8217;s quite a high figure!</p>
<h2>Hollywood&#8217;s Most Overexposed Celebrities for 2008</h2>
<ol>
<li>Paris Hilton (Overexposed Score: 65%)</li>
<li>Britney Spears (65%)</li>
<li><strong>Lindsay Lohan </strong>(56%)</li>
<li><strong>Dina Lohan</strong> (50%)</li>
<li>Pamela Anderson (49%)</li>
<li>OJ Simpson (47%)</li>
<li>Donald Trump (44%)</li>
<li>Miley Cyrus (44%)</li>
<li>Nicole Richie (44%)</li>
<li>Heidi Montag (44%)</li>
</ol>
<p>There are celebrities who live very quiet lives, outside the paparazzi and tabloids. It&#8217;s not easy to do, but it&#8217;s do-able. Particularly with younger celebrities, however, the<strong> paparazzi seem to be part of the recipe of early success.</strong> But they are hard to shake &#8211; and as much as they can sell success, they can also be a recipe for disaster (perhaps?). This is an interesting idea to discuss &#8211; <strong>what do you think?!</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re<strong> <em>not</em> tired of Lindsay </strong>(and I know you&#8217;re not!), then you can <strong>tune in to her movie <em><a href="http://www.crushable.com/chapter-27-us-premiere-dates/">Chapter 27</a></em> when it airs tonight on tv</strong>!! Listing information can be<a href="http://movies.tvguide.com/chapter-27/tv-listings/293090"> found here.</a></p>
<p><em>Image © Peace Arch Entertainment</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://crushable.com">Crushable</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crushable.com/entertainment/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	<media:thumbnail url="http://cdn.b5media.com/hubs-v3/images/headers/crushable.com-140x100.jpg" width="146" height="104" />	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

